Monday, March 18, 2013

HELPING PATIENTS



Sir Luke Fildes: The Doctor
            For centuries, our heroes in medical philosophy have extolled the importance of 'first, do no harm', and 'treat the patient, not the disease'. In today’s world of sub-specialization, the concept of helping patients can get overlooked and unfortunately, you, the patient, are at the mercy of doctors.   
Do physicians actually have a duty to help patients? Is that what society expects of us? Many doctors might say no, that if, for example, a patient is referred to a gastroenterologist for abdominal pain and nothing is found after 'both-end-oscopy', it is perfectly acceptable to discharge the patient back to the referring doctor with no answers or recommendations. Others might think that patients should expect a specialist to actually search for the cause of the pain and help manage the problem.
            It can be argued that helping patients is the primary goal of doctoring. It is when diagnoses or treatments are less than definitive that the concept of being of some help to patients becomes most relevant.  
            So. What does ‘helping the patient’ mean beyond the basics of Hippocrates and Osler? This is my short list. 
FOR PATIENTS:
   More than anything, it begins with the doctor regarding you as a human being, worthy of respect, whether you are a CEO or homeless.
   It means the doctor never talking down to you.
   It means that the doctor acknowledges and respects the family or friends who accompany you into the examination room.
   It means teaching you, when possible, about your condition, not merely saying, "I'll notify your family doctor."
FOR PHYSICIANS:
   More than anything, helping patients means putting the interests of the patient above our interests of revenue production, academics, teaching and career.
   It means being willing to admit failure with one treatment, while continuing to find an alternative.
   It means being more concerned about a patient's health than about our own legal liability, even when there are risks from a particular therapy.
   It means never using the phrase ‘there is nothing I can do for you’ except when it is absolutely true, and then still not using it.
   It means knowing that even if cure cannot be achieved, the caring, teaching, hand holding and outlining of expectations are important parts of management.  
   It means knowing when to stop treatment (chemotherapy, for example).
   It means rethinking difficult cases that don’t make sense. Start again from the beginning. 
   It means combining evidence-based knowledge with experience to arrive at the most appropriate treatment for every patient.
   It means learning to use new effective drugs, or at least referring to someone who knows how to use newer drugs.
   It means prescribing off-label drugs if those are the most appropriate treatment.
   It means getting help from those with more expertise, not for the purpose of getting rid of the patient, but to help arrive at a diagnosis and treatment.
   It means taking extra time during the day if needed, to deal with an urgent problem.
   It means sometimes providing treatment even when there are relative contraindications.
   It means assisting a patient with an urgent problem outside the realm of one’s specialty by facilitating a referral to another specialist or having a discussion with the primary care doctor or contacting home health nurses or calling an ambulance if necessary.  
   It means prescribing narcotics when needed, even if we suspect drug-seeking behavior. The risk of a one-time prescription is nil for the physician. 
   It means being available personally or through shared 'on-call' arrangements, and to take responsibility for complications of treatments originating in our offices. 
   It means never allowing one’s own beliefs or moral convictions to stand in the way of proper medical management.
   Finally, it means never overlooking the fact that even as specialists, we are doctors first, specialists second.

March 18, 2013



Monday, March 4, 2013

Practicing Safe Chicken



I have friends who are freaked-out about chicken. It turns out that many people actually think that chicken gets infected with disease-causing bacteria more than, say, cheese, or avocados; that bacteria specifically seek out chicken to do their procreative dirty work.
I know people who immediately refrigerate a nice juicy hot roasted chicken they are planning to have for a meal within an hour or two! It’s sad, really.
So today’s lesson boys and girls is practicing safe chicken in four simple points.
1.    (Most important) Roasting a chicken kills every living organism. Roasting anything at 350° to 400° for an hour pretty much kills everything. It comes out of the oven STERILE. From that point on, with the exception of drying out, it would take days to weeks at room temperature for any spoilage to develop, and then it would likely be a harmless mold that, while unappealing, wouldn’t make you sick. You don’t believe me, I can tell. Read on.
2.    Since cooking kills everything, there is no need to worry about leaving an uncooked chicken out for several hours to bring it to room temperature before popping it into the oven. Chickens, turkeys, ducks and most meats cook better when brought to room temperature first.
3.    There is nothing special about chicken flesh that preferentially attracts bacteria. If you got sick at the company picnic, it came from the food-handler’s sneeze, not the chicken. (And not the mayo either, because the acid pH of mayo actually helps to prevent spoilage).
4.    The Salmonella that occasionally contaminates raw chicken is real, and justifies separating the surface and knives used for butchering a chicken from those used for foods you plan to eat raw. But fortunately, the Salmonella gets completely nuked by the 160° temperature in the center of a nicely done chicken.

Cheers,
JCS

This blogpost is a long-overdue accompaniment to the Apr 16, 2009 posting entitled “Food Poisoning: it’s not the mayonnaise!”