JFK assassination coverup continues: 53 years and counting

America continues to be lied to about JFK's assassination. The evidence is solid for triangulated gunfire in Dealy Plaza, November 22nd, 1963, with the definitive round coming from the grassy knoll, a head shot fired by James Files. Listen to Wim Dankbaar's 2003 interview with James Files (through jfkmurdersolved.com and Youtube) After much academic hand wringing over how the multiple shots actually occurred, this interview is as credible as they come. It sews up how the hit was carried out. But that is merely the technical part. The story of who organized the assassination and the successful cover up is more complicated and clearly implicates government insiders who wanted Kennedy neutralized. The concept of Oswald as a lone whacko gunman has been completely disproved but remains party line in all major network media sources.

If you are interested in learning more, the nine part series on youtube, THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY is a good starting point. 

https://www.jameschanningshaw.com

jfkmurdersolved.com

MSNBC?--not so much any more

 

I used to crave MSNBC, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow. Smart people, those two. And more or less politically compatible with my liberal thinking, except when it came to them actually promoting the results of the Warren Commission which LBJ commissioned to avoid a real investigation that might have suggested triangulated gunfire including a shot from the front right that took off the back of JFK’s head. How anyone can still buy into Lee Harvey Oswald as JFK's killer amazes me. But that’s getting off point.

Just recently, I decided I can no longer watch Chris or Rachel or anyone else on MSNBC. And it’s not just the incessant Cialis ads and other obnoxious direct-to-consumer advertising by Big Pharma. Chris and Rachel and the gang are so biased in their reporting, so pro-Clinton, and so utterly dismissive of Bernie Sanders and his ideas that it is clear that they or their bosses must be trying to manipulate the election. Did they do this in the Obama/Hillary primaries of ’08? Don’t remember. Must not have had the channel back then.

Sander’s proposals are not  out-of-line with liberal Democratic views. It must be that Sanders-the-man is out-of-line with those who are beholden to Hillary Clinton in some way, or perhaps it is the owners and broadcasters at MSNBC. This generally applies to all the major networks, it’s just more painful at MSNBC. Even PBS, usually so thorough in their coverage of both and all sides of an argument, has been dismissive of Bernie’s message, assuming that Hillary is definitely the nominee, discouraging the all-important battles of ideas.

Come to think of it, maybe it IS Big Pharma. If MSNBC is dependent upon those drug company ads for their profit margin, it would make sense to be against Bernie Sanders because of his strong opposition to the deplorable ways of Big Pharma.

 Whether it is biased individual anchors, the influence of Big Pharma, or indebted management, I’m almost finished with MSNBC. I’ve also given up on the rest of corporate network TV, and I suspect I’m not alone in this thinking. Unbiased, respectful reporting will have to be found elsewhere.

https://www.jameschanningshaw.com